Re: A86: Re: Real stupid question

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Real stupid question
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 15:52:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <2b0d5fb0.35e253b1@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


That would be ~1.3 e-mails a second...naw I don't read that fast. :)

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 TGaArdvark@aol.com wrote:

> 
> > How long do you think it takes to read 1,400+ e-mails? :)
> 
> 18 minutes, if you're a fast reader.  That's what it SHOULD
> have taken you anyway.  If you hadn't spent hours chatting
> on AOL.
>

References:

Re: A86: Re: Real stupid question

From: TGaArdvark@aol.com

Prev: A86: Re: sqrt prog.
Next: Re: A86: Re: sqrt prog.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread