Re: A85: Rigel, where'd it go??


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A85: Rigel, where'd it go??



 If you let the last part of your shell contain calls not needed when a
program is running it is actually not a problem. Depending on how you do the
relocation you either just relocate the program into the middle of your
shell, or you moe the last part of your shell some where else, and then you
relocate the program. It is actually fairly easy, and it has been tested
with Ash.

Dines

-----Original Message-----
From: Will Stokes <wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu>
To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: 16. oktober 1997 05:00
Subject: Re: A85: Rigel, where'd it go??



>
>
>VERY good point. hadn't thought of that... yet =)
>
>>
>> And you will still have problems (I assume) to make future Rigel version
>> backward compatible when you use fixed address relocation, even if you
>> leave 50 byte or so of empty space at the end of the shell.
>>
>> --
>> Jimmy Mårdell                "The nice thing about standards is that
>> mailto:mja@algonet.se         there are so many of them to choose from."
>> http://www.algonet.se/~mja
>> IRC: Yarin                   "Sanity? I'm sure I have it on tape
>> somewhere!"
>>
>
>
> Biya! =)
>
>                         .       .     .
>                     .    .   .             .
>              .    .                            .     .
>          .                     Will Stokes                .
>      .             wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu           .
>    .                   wstokes@geocities.com                       .
>      .  http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/7360/will.htm    .
>       .                                                             .
>      .                                                               .
>       .   http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/7360/      .
>        .    .           (The TI-85 Calc. Center)               .
>          .                                                      .
>               .               .                     .       .
>                  .         .    .       .    .    .   .   .
>                     .   .          .   .       .       .
>                       .
>
>


Follow-Ups: