Re: LZ: Ti-H:RF Link for chatting.
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Well, I've sort of thought about this!
The frequencies are not important and can be changed.
They are just not supposed to be above app. 105 MHz (The limit of my low
cost transistor)
Calc1 Transmit: 40 MHz ; Recieve 60 MHz
Calc2 Transmit: 60 MHz ; Recieve 40 MHz
I guess the next question would be:
Calc1 Transmit: 40 MHz ; Recieve 60 MHz
Calc2 Transmit: 40 MHz ; Recieve 60 MHz
Or
Calc1 Transmit: 60 MHz ; Recieve 40 MHz
Calc2 Transmit: 60 MHz ; Recieve 40 MHz
My solution would be a switch to exchange the frequencies on one of the
calculators, that would bring us to the first example. If anybody has a
better idea, please tell me so.
This link could of course only be used in pairs.
PS: Sorry about RT, I was thinking radio transfer. It should have been RF
Hope anybody cares to help me, Laurits <CSN@dk-online.dk>
----------
> From: C.J. Oster <cjo@pobox.com>
> To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: LZ: Ti-H:RT Link for chatting.
> Date: 4. november 1996 04:18
>
> > Be able to send all the characters on the Ti-85 in a quick and easy
way.
> > It should only send on the red linkwire and only recieve on the white
>
> Problem, if I send on my white wire, you'll get it on you're white wire.
> If both of our calcs are sitting here transmitting on the same wire, and
> waiting for data on the wire that neither one of us are tranmitting on,
> nothing will happen. However, you have an idea. The ti link is
esentially
> sterio sound right? But modems work on mono telephone lines...does
anybody
> see my point? If my calc transmitts on the white wire, and your calc
> listens on the white wire, then what sould be the problem? We only really
> need to use one of the lines.
>
> -C.J.-
>
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> Unsolicited commercial e-mail to the poster of this message
> will be proofread at $70/hr, minimum charge $150. Submission
> of such e-mail to this address will suffice as contractual assent
> to the said charging schedule.
> ********************************************************************
>
>
>
References: