Re: LZ: TI and a TI-86?

Subject: Re: LZ: TI and a TI-86?
From: Matt Shetler D.O.C. <jfreak@nvi.nvi.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 16:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199608271745.NAA10868@mime4.prodigy.com>

I believe you got your lines mixed up. I asked an 83 wueston and someone 
responded saying that if the 83 were better than the 85 they would have 
called it an 86. They were talking about the 83 when they said it 
supports ASM. They were saying that the 83 did not have the abilities and 
if it did it would have been called an 86.
              -Matt Shetler








On Tue, 27 Aug 1996, KEITH T BURZINSKI wrote:


> Over the last few days I've noticed a few letters that made mention 
> of a TI-86 (which would possess all of the abilities of a TI-85, and 
> possibly more, and include built-in ASM support).  If TI _IS_ keeping 
> a close watch, like they claim, does anyone here think that they 
> might actually put such a calculator into production?
> 
> Just a thought,
> 
> ____
> ~Keith
> FFNP69C@PRODIGY.COM
>

References:

LZ: TI and a TI-86?

From: KEITH T BURZINSKI <FFNP69C@prodigy.com>

Prev: Re: LZ: Re: your mail
Next: Re: LZ:83 ASM
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread