Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 20:03:03 +0000
References: <3894C2C3.C25FAA70@clara.net> <389528F6.8AC1B338@prism.gatech.edu> <001101bf6bb8$02e24140$1a5feda9@ucdavis.edu> <389535A0.F3F7E6F6@prism.gatech.edu> <3895B1FC.A0C62231@clara.net> <001701bf6c1c$97f71620$396a3d80@eastnet.gatech.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


No I havn't becuase I don't own an 83. I don't know how the 83 handles
assembler programs, my comments only apply to the Plus.

--Robin Kay--

Harper Maddox wrote:

> have you ever played Joltima?  Its 25.1k  Runs great on the 83 without a
> cumbersome shell.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>
> To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
>
> >
> > As I understand it you can't run a program that big using the existing
> > method of relocation. You would have to use an opcode convereter like I
> > suggested, some of my other points simply make sense if you're going to
> > take this step anyway.
> >
> > --Robin Kay--
> >
> > Richard Harper Maddox wrote:
> >
> > > im posting off of a Solaris machine at school.
> > >
> > > My ideal shell is a bare bones module that allows for program write
> > > back, and can run a 26k program with 1k of free space.  thats it.
> > >
> > > -harper
> >
> >

References:

A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Richard Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: "Kouri" <Kouri@ucdavis.edu>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Richard Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: "Harper Maddox" <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>