Re: A83:STILL NEED HELP!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83:STILL NEED HELP!
Yes it is. It is very inefficient to have it in a subroutine in the first
place. just jump to a subroutine and ret is 17+10 clocks.
this routine you have made will mostly ret after the the second try, so your
total delay will be 17+11+4+12+11+4+7+10=76 clocks...
(assuming that the number of clocks "needed" is 18-44 clocks)
//Olle
Daniel M Church wrote:
> dWait: in a,(10h)
> rla
> jr c,dWait
> ret
>
> Is that inefficient?
Follow-Ups:
References: