Re: A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:25:40 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <002c01be8915$988dc920$0ba5c389@ellis>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

On 17-Apr-99, you wrote:

> How do you fix this, though?
> It seems such a strange concept...The order of loading being
> important.
> The symbol table will be different. But how does that matter...
> Cant you add some sorting routine or somthing to fix this...
> Yeh, probally a bit pointless....

I don't like repeating myself, but I _have_ a solution to this problem, I
_have_ presented it to Joe on this list, and the solution is to use
_insertmem and _delmem when moving the program data back and forth. The
symtab will be intact, you can use safe ram areas for buffering, everyone
will be happy and peace on earth will arise. But this is ofcourse Joe's
choice.

Linus
-- 
                                                           wwww 
                                                          (o)(O)
.-->                                           .-------mm--(__)--mm--------.
| Linus Akesson                                | http://linusworld.cjb.net |
`---------------^-- ----- --- --  -- -  -   -  `---------ooO--Ooo----------'
               Here I am. Now what are your other two wishes?

Follow-Ups:

Re: A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!

From: "Joe Wingbermuehle" <joewing@usmo.com>

References:

A83: Re: Re: Aghh Bug!

From: ceebje <B.J.Ellis@hw.ac.uk>

Prev: Re: A83: Aghh Bug!
Next: A83: Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 07:32:40 PDT
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread