Re: A82: Shell Analysis


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A82: Shell Analysis




THRBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB (supposed to sound like tongue out and spitting or
however you would describe that)

~Adamman

In a message dated 98-06-29 03:18:59 EDT, you write:

> Cmutr@aol.com wrote:
>  
>  > In a message dated 98-06-28 12:33:10 EDT, you write:
>  >
>  > <<
>  >  Hey dude, I'm not "mad" at you or anything. I'm just,
>  >  y'know, telling you what I think. Anyways, I think that
>  >  this should be a ticalc.org survey question:
>  >
>  >  "Are more assembly shells good or bad for a calculator?"
>  >
>  >  A) Good
>  >  B) Bad
>  >  C) Undecided/Don't care
>  >
>  >  Then we'd have a better idea of what everyone thinks of this, not just
>  >  people like me who talk a lot. :)
>  >
>  >                                                 -Kouri
>  >   >>
>  >
>  > BAD- we should have one so all programs can be run on it, and maybe make 
> it
>  > work with add on components to suit everyones needs-then everyone can
make 
> the
>  > misc. components that can be added to it as .exe files that modify the
>  > program- like AOL upgrades (sort of)
>  
>  Just what we need is an AOLer telling us to make TI shells like AOL's 
> software. :)
>  
>  --
>  Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>     File Archives, HTML, and Support
>     the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/