Re: TI-H: TI-86 (was "Basic $5 link question")

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: TI-86 (was "Basic $5 link question")

Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> 
> Jake Robb wrote:
> > down.  Also, the 86 still uses the 85's format for complex numbers
> > [(a,b)], rather than dealing directly with i like the 83 and 92 do.
> >
> > --
> >     Jake Robb     Email:jake@netrus.net
> 
> Well, that's easy enough to fix: just create a constant called i that
> has a value of (0,1).  It works great.  (As long as you don't mind
> output in (a,b) format and don't stick it right next to a variable name;
> use A*i not Ai)

I know, I did that on my 85, but haven't yet had to do complex numbers
on my 86 (hey, I've only had it for about 10 days).  When the time
comes, I'll do that.

Hey does anyone know what ever happened with that 92 ROM module someone
was going to try to make that would put Linux on a 92?

-- 
    Jake Robb     Email:jake@netrus.net
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 < "Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice >
 <  doggy' until you can find a rock."   >
 <  -Unknown                             >
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
References: