Re: TI-89?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-89?
Scott Noveck (SMN) wrote:
> It's NOT backwards compatible -- it's a scaled down handheld version of the
> 92
> And no, this is actually a good idea (It'll be SAT-allowed), but the 73
> sounds dumb. . .
You _can_ transfer anything from the 89 to the 92 Plus _and_ vice-versa. You
can also send limited things from the 89 to the 92 and vice-verse.
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
References:
- Re: TI-89?
- From: "Scott Noveck (SMN)" <noveck@PLUTO.NJCC.COM>