No, not probably not, but that is essentially what I was saying in the first place. CaptainSp Grant Stockly wrote: > > >My words were "not in a hurry to..." Read more carefully next time. > > They didn't know there was a need or even people who would want to use ASM. > THats the only reason why its in the 83/86. I bet they never thought > people would be playing 17sec wavs on their calcs...