RE: A92: Geometry
RE: A92: Geometry
i agree with you that the 92 is not only made for assembly programmers but everyone who own a 92 enjoy assembly programs even if he doesn't program himself.
i'm using my 92 a lot in mathematics at school and i enjoy doing calculus with it because it's nice and very useful but i never used it for geometry problems
i understand what you meant when you said that more features, more people buy 92+, ... but note that you were wrong when you said that i'll buy the 92+ module only for the memory because i won't have to buy it because i've already one 92+ module (i got onefrom ti in order to testing it) and because i'm using a lot the differential equation solving and units features (which are really great)... (but maybe i'll buy a second 92+ module for my second ti92 (a 92 II, much faster than the 92+ !))
i said that the geometry was unsuseful because i know a lot of people who own a 92 and nobody uses the geometry so that i was convinced that nobody at all uses it - you proved me that it's false, thanx!
De: Anton Ivanov [SMTP:email@example.com]
Date: samedi 28 mars 1998 14:54
Objet: Re: A92: Geometry
Yo Yo, Geometry is a cool thing!
It may hurt your ego, but the calculator isn't developed as an assembly programming toy for people with too much time on their hands. It has other uses, you know.
I do agree that some features could be better, a lot better, but not at the expense of geometry or other features. Look at it this way: the more features, the more people buy the calcs, the
happier TI is, the better calcs they make...
I mean, you'll be buying the plus module because it gives you memory, not because of differential equations and enhanced geometry, right? So you might as well say, well why do they put it
there in the first place? Because other people use these things too!
So, everyone, stop whining about this
Christophe GIAUME wrote:
> i bought my first ti92 2.5 years ago and i've *NEVER* used the geometry (i used it only once a few days after i got my first ti92)
> i think ti's developpers should spent more time on increasing text/prgm editor's speed, on integrating a real assembly programming solution in the 92+ module... and just remove the geometry
> Part 1.2 Type: application/ms-tnef
> Encoding: base64
- Could not process part with given Content-Type: