Re: A92: Re: Mac C -> Fargo "C4Fargo Mac" released
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: Re: Mac C -> Fargo "C4Fargo Mac" released
The question then comes to: do we try to implement C on the TI-92, or would it be
better to Create a new language(posibly C-like) that would be more efficiently
implemented on the TI-92 or the TI-8x family. Then we could write standard
functions that would be "platform" independant. A sepeate compile stage would
build programs for 92,86,... and would still be availible on future calcs (IE
TI-92plus)...
Evan
Bryan Christopher Turner wrote:
> Ok, I've gotten enough mail about this, so I'll just post it here (sorry to
> those not interested in C development on the TI-92).
>
> Hope this explains the C Kit well enough for some other kits to get
> developed. If you do get another kit working, let me know so we can
> standardize them, no one needs a kit war (especially not like the OS war on the
> '85s!!).
>
> --Bryan
> bcturner@eos.ncsu.edu
--
*------------------------------------------*
Evan J. Felix
USU Research Foundation Space Dynamics Lab
Data Processing Center
*------------------------------------------*
References: