[A89] Re: Emulators

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A89] Re: Emulators
From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:05:21 -0500
References: <002d01c0cd32$a6964a20$bb902140@computer>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


I would probably have to say the emulator from TI would be more accurate
than vti. I would think this would be true since TI would probably want
everything to run exactly as it would on the real deal but with vti the
hardware might not all be correctly emulated plus there's a chance for
errors when it runs the rom. There's an easy way to find out which one is
more accurate...run it on a real calc and see which one it runs like.

> Sorry, Nick if I offended you; I was serious about the aluminum foil
though,
> I have actually done that with a broken keyboard once when i was really
> desperate. It worked!
>
>
> I have a question about vti, how accurately does it emulate hw2 calcs?
Also,
> how accurately does the simulator supplied with ti's beta sdk emulate a
hw2
> calc?
>
> The reason i ask is because I have an event hook that I've written mostly
in
> c, and It runs fine in vti, but crashes with a line 1111 emulator error in
> the ti simulator...
>
> Also, If you have a hw2, and/or would like to test for me, you can go to
> http://www.geocities.com/gdietsche/Downloads/89/  and download ash. ASH is
> pretty much ready to be released, but I would hate to have it crash on
those
> poor HW2 users! Also, if you have some feed back on it or whatever, please
> email me (gdietsche@email.com)
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>

References:

[A89] Emulators

From: "Greg" <newstome2001@yahoo.com>