A89: Re: Re: Re: "C"
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A89: Re: Re: Re: "C"
I've thought for a long time that ticalc should merge the a-89 and a-92
lists... They're almost exactly the same....
----- Original Message -----
From: Kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 11:09 PM
Subject: A89: Re: Re: "C"
>
> I like this idea, but perhaps we could even take it a few steps further,
> changing the entire ticalc list setup:
>
> C-programming -- for all C related messages on any C capable calc
> asm-68k -- for all 68k assembly related messages on any 68k based calc
> asm-z80 -- for all z80 assembly related messages on any z80 based calc
> system-85
> system-86
> system-89
> etc. -- for all _system programming and interface_ related
> questions on the specific calc.
>
> So, if you were going to make a TI-89 program in C, you would ask
questions
> about how to code a section in C-programming, and you would ask questions
> about which the interface to a specific ROM function was in system-89.
>
>
> Just some thoughts concerning a better system
>
> --kaus
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sebastian Reichelt" <SebastianR@gmx.de>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 6:27 PM
> Subject: A89: Re: "C"
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > | We need another list for C programmers for the 89. C
> > | is nice, but it's different from asm, and should kept
> > | separate. It seems the "assembly-89" list has become
> > | the "C-89" list.
> >
> > It doesn't have to be "C-89." Why not call it just "C-Programming,"
since
> > it would apply equally to the TI-89 and 92-Plus, and possibly to other
> > calculators as well. If you have something on one calculator, it should
> be
> > easy to port it to another.
> >
> > Just a suggestion.
> >
> > Sebastian Reichelt
> >
> >
>
>
>
References: