Re: A89: Shell compatibility

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Shell compatibility
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 04:52:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <c560d72c.360da78f@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Right, but running PlusShell programs with Doors installed is dumb and
pointless.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, Newsletter, and HTML
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:

> 
> In a message dated 9/26/98 10:30:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> brabeler@ticalc.org writes:
> 
> > Well, if you want to only run Doors programs, then installing Doors OS
> >  wouldn't be inefficient.  But if you wanted to run PlusShell programs as
> >  well (basically the same thing as regular 89-asm), then it would be
> >  inefficient.  You can run PlusShell programs without installing any
> >  "shell".  All you need is the libraries.
> 
> The plusshell programs would be inefficient.  Doors and plusshell programs can
> run once doors is installed.  until then only plusshell (regular) programs can
> be run.  l would install doors ONLY if it's primary purpose is to load
> whatever it does so that individual programs don't have to.
>

References:

Re: A89: Shell compatibility

From: TurboSoft@aol.com

Prev: Re: A89: Shell compatibility
Next: Re: A89: Virus Scanner for the 89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread