Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
From: Jimmy =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rdell?= <yarin@acc.umu.se>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 02:37:50 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980320060559.20044B-100000@S-98-47.resnet.oh io-state.edu>
References: <010601bd53a5$6b7ff8a0$2df5ffd0@matt>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


At 06:21 1998-03-20 -0500, you wrote:
>It's true that ZShell required a whole lot of disassemblimg to find out
>where various ROM routines were, but the program itself was pretty simple.
>The important routines were
>	1. call a ROM function based on the version number of the calc
>	2. call or jump to a location within the program

You do know that if ZShell hadn't been created, we might still
be stuck with TI-calcs without asm programming possibilites :-)
(not supported that is). We owe Dan Eble a damn lot :-)

--
Real name: Jimmy Mårdell                 
IRC......: Yarin                         
Email....: mailto:yarin@acc.umu.se      <-- NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS!!!!
Homepage.: http://www.algonet.se/~mja/

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)

From: Dan Eble <eble@cis.ohio-state.edu>

References:

Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)

From: "Matt2000" <matt2000@gte.net>

From:

Prev: Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
Next: Re: A86: Asm Questions that have been building up :)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread