Re: A86: 83 emulations

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: 83 emulations
From: Tim Buckingham <zoneti@home.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 15:54:56 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <ef1c4af1.36659a95@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 12/1/98 23:51:36 Eastern Standard Time, ZeromusMog@aol.com
> writes:
>
> > << Can someone make a shell with 83 emulation >>
> >
> >  It's called ase. :)
>
> i thought ase had 82/85 emulation but not 83.  if it DOES have 83, than i sure
> wish i'd known about this sooner!

No, sadly there isn't... SCaBBy had 83 emu in RAscall but he "lost" his beta w/ it
that Adam Berlinsky (or however you spell it) and someone else has ( I don't
remember whom ) =)

-=> }InFuZeD{

References:

Re: A86: 83 emulations

From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com

Prev: Re: A86: The End
Next: Re: A86: pt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread