Re: LZ:83 ASM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ:83 ASM
On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Andy Selle wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 15:35:19 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: "Matt Shetler D.O.C." <jfreak@nvi.nvi.net>
> > To: list-zshell@defiant.rbk.sollentuna.se
> > Cc: list-zshell@defiant.rbk.sollentuna.se
> > Subject: LZ:83 ASM
> > Reply-to: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
> hahahhahahah.... my math teacher said the same thing. I know why
> they say that. They have been trained to use the 82. Now they see
> the 83 and the like because hey it works the same (mostly). They
> don't want to have people making it difficult for them. The 85 has
> the superior mathematic functionality. Thats why the TI-83 is not
> the TI-86. If you are willing to spend the miniscule amount of time
> to learn the simple ti-85 OS (which in my opinion is 20000 times
> better than the 82's) then the ti85 is right for you. I for one am
> going to stick to programming the 85 (until Mshell comes out and then
> I'm going to do that too). I think most of the developers will stick
> to the 85.
>
>
> -Andy
what's Mshell (if you don't mind me asking) Andy?
-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Pixel Dreamer c684852@showme.missouri.edu
Security Enthusaist "Without an identity, we are all invisible"
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!
References: