[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)
From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:43:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030128171045.00a9cac0@mail.comcast.net>
References: <F155r52Q8xBBprMYw2Q00002330@hotmail.com> <F155r52Q8xBBprMYw2Q00002330@hotmail.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20030128171045.00a9cac0@mail.comcast.net>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:13:43 -0500, Gavin Olson wrote:

> Yeah.  Libs are a pain.  There is a generation of programs for the
> TI-89 that require a combination of libraries, with differing levels
> of support for OS and hardware (damn the 89's hardware rev!)
> revisions.  The newer generation of programs requiring no libs are
> much easier to deal with.  Of course, the 89 has way more room to
> waste on redundant code, too.  Perhaps you could do this:  When a
> program runs, it checks for other programs using the libs.  If it
> finds one, it points itself to the program with the libs and deletes
> its own set of the libs.  This leads to problems if you delete the
> first program to be run on the calc, but allows you to include libs in
> every program but only have one copy on-calc.

It would be easier to put libc in an app. Plenty of space there. 83+
only then though.

Follow-Ups:

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: <corey@acz.org>

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: <corey@acz.org>

References:

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: "Aaron St.John" <aaronstj@hotmail.com>

[A83] Re: CRT (was SDCC port)

From: Gavin Olson <gtolson@comcast.net>