[A83] Re: Conditional bcall()ing
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A83] Re: Conditional bcall()ing
>At 18:28 2001-10-29, you wrote:
>> >TASM will convert 'label' to an address which depends on the '.org'
>>directive.
>>
>>I know quite sure this is only the case with jp.
>
>No. read the rest of the mail:
>
>> >Then TASM computes the number of bytes between the address of the byte
>> >after the 'jr' instruction and the calculated address of 'label'.
In that case, tasm is a bit crappy, isnt it? Why first calculate an address
that depends on the .org directive, and then make it relative again?
>he is right, and I am wrong again :)
>Always messier then you think when you try to sort out the relationship
>between the asm and the actual machine language (opcodes). They are farther
>away from eachother then you think sometimes.
>labels are anyway always (crossing fingers) just human-readable names for
>adresses, or offsets to the current instruction if used together with
>instructions that use relative adressing. (like jr)
I think you are right this time :)
>///Olle
>
>
>