Re: A83: Re: Re: Assembly-83 Digest V1 #913


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A83: Re: Re: Assembly-83 Digest V1 #913




Remember, there is _quite_ a difference between simple opcode to bytecode
translation (ala DOS debug) and an assembler.

>   Actually I created one in basic that I didn't finish
> entirely.  (Trying to remember, its been 3 years
> almost) I basically stored everything to a string with
> a nice input routine and stored a : inbetween the
> commands, and then when you decided to compile it, I
> just checked the string for commands (starts with L so
> go here, check next letter, ect...)  It was slow and
> pretty much sucked parsing wise but it worked for a
> lot of the commands.  It also checked for errors and
> told you what it couldn't compile (unknown commands
> ect...)
>
>   I actually wrote this program before I new a lick of
> spit about asm though, so some of my things may have
> been wrong.
>    I actually didn't release all of it either, Later I
> had created a asm program that took your generated
> code and stuck it into a program for you to run, with
> the name you wanted, ect...
>
>   I thought about making an asm one, hell I even
> started it but I stopped after I decided that it was
> useless.  One screw up and boom, you have to start
> over.  (Unless you made a crash protector but still
> implausible for the 83)




References: