yay

Aren't there enough OSes for the 86?

who says you can't improve on what has already been done?

amicek

Of course then there's the question of which shell to use. Especially if you're new to the scene.

ticalc used to have a good 86 shell comparison page, but I don't think it exists anymore, and if it does, it would be hoplessly out of date.

Hmmm, BugOS acts *ALOT* like Rascall (my favorite 86 "shell")

Rasscall should step a side. Arron Curtis Yet Another Shell is where its at now. Until another 85/82 emulating shell comes forward with support for programs over 8k YAS will reighn supreme!

Boy was I wasted last night when I wrote that comment. I apologise to all the rascall v.9 users out there.

The only thing where it acts like rascal is the about/help screen which in fact is taken from rascal v0.9.

Except that it doesn't do half the cool stuff Rascall does.

Wait for BugOS v0.9 :)

Are you planning 85 emmulation and so forth? I hope so, because BugOS is the best looking interface I've seen since Rascall (Damn it, Shepcar, you were so close. Why didn't you just finish the freakin' thing? Oh well, it's still cool.)

Hmmm, why doesn't anyone write a shell for the 86 that can emulate the 83(+)? It's dead easy to do, I've written the code but I can't be bothered to stick an interface on it so I've never released it.

Are these guys Linux users, as I think? Hope so. They'll know about real code if they do. Must read the source...

Ciaran McCreesh
http://www.asm86.cwc.net/ for a ti86 assembly tutorial.

You should send your code to someone making a shell.

I, myself am a linux user. (Not one of those stupid people who only uses KDE either). I can't speak for anyone else in the group, though.

Yeah!
I'm downloading the disasm!!!
this looks pretty cool!!!

Thats great Jar-Jar.