[TI-H] Re: TI Networking.

[TI-H] Re: TI Networking.

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: [TI-H] Re: TI Networking.
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 11:44:52 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010502101758.00b4dfd0@mail.passagen.se>
• References: <20010501.224316.-884329.0.rabidcow@juno.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

At 10:32 2001-05-02, I wrote:
>smallest size in my packet is 5 bytes with one byte payload. I think
>variable length could be nice vor versatility, and doesn't add much
>complexity or overhead.
>But you are right about that the checksum isn't very needed. ofcourse it
>would be correcting if it was there, it isn't just for show :)
>hmm.. the question is if the net is reliable enough to send without any
>errorcorrection.


sorry, mixed up errorcorrection and errordetection here.
I would say error detection is more preferred. I think it is less 
resource-consuming to resend then to do an advanced check that can correct, 
on every data.
specially since this is probably a low-error environment.

///Olle

• [TI-H] more about TI Networking.
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

• [TI-H] Re: TI Networking.
• From: rabidcow@juno.com
• [TI-H] Re: TI Networking.
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

• Prev: [TI-H] Re: I remember hearing of a ti hub project a few years ago...
• Next: [TI-H] more about TI Networking.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread