Re: TI-H: Since the list has been DEAD lately... (off topic too :)


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Since the list has been DEAD lately... (off topic too :)




well, i picked up the one from RS, and it works fine... :) And it probably
would've costed more than $3.59 after shipping.

-jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: ryan pogge <pogge@shore.intercom.net>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, April 22, 1999 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: TI-H: Since the list has been DEAD lately... (off topic too :)


>
>oh and that part will work for sami's link also.
>and it  costs 2.50 I think.
>
>
>
>> ya.. i found it... but does anyone have a remote control thats small
>enough
>> that only has a few buttons? I know I don't... also, I had to do a
>bit of
>> looking, but almost all the UIR receivers out there use the SFH-506
>reciever
>> from Siemens. the problem, is that Siemens discontinued making that
>item...
>> well, I found a version that uses the receiver that radio shack
>makes (a lot
>> more available than the one siemens used to make), and also, it can
>be used
>> for a workable IR link for TI to whatever transfers. I know that the
>link
>> Sami Khawam had made up uses IR, but it uses the SFH-506
>reciever/decoder,
>> and is a royal pain to find.
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ryan pogge <pogge@shore.intercom.net>
>> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 03:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: TI-H: Since the list has been DEAD lately... (off topic
>too :)
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Universal Infared Remote
>> >leme find the url
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> From: ryan pogge <pogge@shore.intercom.net>
>> >> >OR why dont you just use the UIR like everyone else?
>> >> >like a million people have done the car computer thing...
>> >> >go look on the net most of them use UIR.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What is a UIR?
>> >>
>> >> DK
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>



Follow-Ups: