Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
From: Adam Davis <adavis@baladyne.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 10:01:11 -0400
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
References: <19990408220009.583E4A408C@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se> <370D68F1.64C1681D@alaska.net>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Build Grant's parallel port version, and use a program to send the file
to it.  MUCH less overhead.

-Adam

amaya@alaska.net wrote:
> 
> While we're on the subject of MP3, what do you think is the MP3 player
> with the lowest overhead?  I've got Winamp right now and it seems like
> all the fancy graphics and stuff slow it down.  Do the sound qualities
> differ between players?  Does anyone care?  (This is after all a TI
> Hardware list, not that anyone would know with the messages we've been
> getting recently.)  Any answers are appreciated.  Turning this message
> into another giant argument with page long quotes is not.  Peace.

References:

From:

TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

From: amaya@alaska.net

Prev: Re: TI-H: Linux link software.
Next: Re: TI-H: Linux link software.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread