Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 19:17:43 -0800
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• In-Reply-To: <370D68F1.64C1681D@alaska.net>
• References: <19990408220009.583E4A408C@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>While we're on the subject of MP3, what do you think is the MP3 player
>with the lowest overhead?  I've got Winamp right now and it seems like
>all the fancy graphics and stuff slow it down.  Do the sound qualities
>differ between players?  Does anyone care?  (This is after all a TI
>Hardware list, not that anyone would know with the messages we've been
>getting recently.)  Any answers are appreciated.  Turning this message
>into another giant argument with page long quotes is not.  Peace.

It depends on the encoded file.  If mp123 is available for the Windows,
then that would be a good choice (or just the engine).

Grant

• From:
• TI-H: More MPEG but diff. topic
• From: amaya@alaska.net

• Prev: Re: TI-H: Linux link software.
• Next: Re: TI-H: Linux link software.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread