Re: TI-H: heh

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: heh
From: "Jon Olson" <morph@jmss.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 02:16:32 -0500
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


i hope you've either got an ass load od free HD space, or a LOT of phsyical
ram, because i'm currently using 48 megs of RAM running WinNT, Outlook
Express, and a couple mIRC's... NT is a bigass memory hog.

-- Jon Olson

-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, November 28, 1998 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: TI-H: heh


>
>>That is the most RETARDED thing I've ever heard... running two OS's at the
>>same time doesn't quite work out.  Especially since NT is so over
>>protective.
>
>You have to run them in different sessions.  Gee...  They don't know the
>other is running.
>
>>I don't see how my 133 isn't capable of doing those things,
>>theoretically.  But then again I don't see a need to run two OS's at the
>>same time, especially MICROSOFT WindowsNT.
>
>I guess you don't get to manage several ethernet hubs by SNMP.  For the
>hubs I have I have to use NT.  NT doesn't use any comptuer time when I have
>it frozen.  I can freeze its state.
>
>Grant
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: heh

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>