Re: TI-H: heh

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: heh
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 21:22:40 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <912228667.2053.38@excite.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>That is the most RETARDED thing I've ever heard... running two OS's at the
>same time doesn't quite work out.  Especially since NT is so over
>protective.

You have to run them in different sessions.  Gee...  They don't know the
other is running.

>I don't see how my 133 isn't capable of doing those things,
>theoretically.  But then again I don't see a need to run two OS's at the
>same time, especially MICROSOFT WindowsNT.

I guess you don't get to manage several ethernet hubs by SNMP.  For the
hubs I have I have to use NT.  NT doesn't use any comptuer time when I have
it frozen.  I can freeze its state.

Grant

References:

TI-H: heh

From: "Dan" <danb@excite.com>