Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
Have you looked at some recent (ie 6 months new) RISC processors? They
have tons more instructions than "old" risc processors.
RISC 'implimentations' of the x86 chipset are faster than the CISC
counterparts...
Grant
>No... CISC combines instructions so it is basically like when a CISC
>does 1 instruction, it Could be the same as 2 RISC instructions... now
>this pretty much applicable in some cases, but other advanced cases like
>graphics, RISC IS better... but you CANT go around saying "oh cisc is
>better" cuz that isn't necessarily true, although it could be true... IT
>ALL DEPENDS on the app...
>
>
>>Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:32:58 -0900
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>Subject: Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
>>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>
>>
>>Ummm... :) No.
>>
>>In any application, a shorter instruction cycle is better...
>>
>>Explain yourself.
>>
>>Grant
>>
>>
>>>yea, thats cuz it is REDUCED instruction... LIKE I said, it ALL
>depends
>>>on the application...
>>>
>>>>
>>>>RISC CPUs based on instruction cycle are faster...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>______________________________________________________
>>>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
References: