RE: TI-H: 92+ or HP 48GX


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: TI-H: 92+ or HP 48GX



only real drawback, no conversion support!  Of course, there might be a Fargo program for that, but I don't know, since I don't HAVE a 92, I just hear the complaints.
Christopher Kalos
raptorone@geocities.com
VirtuTech Developer's Group
AOL IM: Raptor1CK

----------
From: 	Ritchie Argue[SMTP:ciphyr@usa.net]
Sent: 	Sunday, March 15, 1998 11:42 PM
To: 	ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: 	Re: TI-H: 92+ or HP 48GX


>     Right now I have a two year old TI-92, and  I don't really know what
>to do with all of the new calculators out.  I was  debating getting
>the plus module, but the I heard the HP 48GX was a much better
>calculator, I also heard it is real expensive.  Does anyone know how
>much  it costs, and has anyone had enough experience with both calculators
>(the 92 and  the HP) to know which is the better choice.  I am
>currently a senior in  high school and I have been frustrated on my ACT
>and SAT by not being able to  use my 92.  I ended up just doing the
>math in my head - it wasn't hard at  all.  However my AP Calculus
>test is coming up and I wanted to know if the  HP was worth the
>investment. 

I'd stick with the 92.  I use it daily on second year math - prob&stats,
de's, discrete, calqlust, linear alg, and am continually blown away by it's
symbolic power.  Granted, it does have some shortcomings, but it's much
better than a 48gx for general math.

Ritchie


Warning
Could not process part with given Content-Type: application/ms-tnef

Follow-Ups: