Re: TI-H: random email

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 17:24:06 -0700
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...

If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
Inc. processors.

>That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>
>Please, take it to e-mail;  the last thing this list needs is another PC/MAC
>flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>>
>>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
>>
>><<
>> It´s the reason you aren´t lumbered with stone-age command-line interfaces
>> as your only OS option, buddy.
>>
>> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II chip, and
>> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
>>
>>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows will run
>>better on that machine, then on a PC.
>>
>>Just my .02
>>Dave
>>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: random email

From: nuke@bayside.net