Re: Re(2): Re(2): TI-H: MP3s
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re(2): Re(2): TI-H: MP3s
When you have your 2,000 watt stero in a gym or at a dance, and you turn
your amps up to about 750watts, when the drums beat and people sing, you
can hear a slight distortion level. I think its something like 5%.
>Actually, I was talking to Grant :). I would believe that with top-quality
>equipment you could hear the difference, but most of us (even audiophiles)
>won't under normal conditions. Besides, their size and portability greatly
>outweigh their slight quality deficiancy [sp?].
>
>-Gabe
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Knaack <dknaack@geocities.com>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Thursday, June 04, 1998 4:26 PM
>Subject: Re: Re(2): Re(2): TI-H: MP3s
>
>
>>
>>From: Gabe <Gabeman@Earthling.net>
>>> What the hell are you babbling about? Don't try to make yourself
>>look
>>>like an 'eleet' audiophile. mp3's sound practically cd quality at
>>128k/44.1
>>>if they are encoded correctly.
>>
>>
>>Was that addressed to me??
>>
>>What I said was, on my test equipment (P133, WinAmp, Marantz receiver,
>>monoblock amps and Snell E5's), MP3's did not sound as good as the
>>original CD. 'practically cd quality' is NOT CD quality, and I can
>>hear the
>>difference in many selections.
>>
>>If you MP3 encode a pink noise sample, you can get an idea of what
>>artifacts you should be listening for.
>>
>>I'm no audiophool, I just prefer to have music that has as few errors
>>as possible, because they do have an impact on the SQ!.
>>
>>I would like to do testing with the DAC from a CD player, and I happen
>>to have two dead CD players, so I have some equipment to test with.
>>
>>I don't give a fuck if you can't hear the difference, I CAN (in blind
>>testing),
>>so it makes a difference to me.
>>
>>DK
>>
>>