Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.

Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: bryanr <bryanr@flash.net>
• Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 01:47:43 -0400
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <l03130317b1d5554cda8b@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313030cb1d52e89be4f@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313030cb1d52e89be4f@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130317b1d5554cda8b@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313031eb1d566e6fdc2@[192.168.1.66]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Grant Stockly wrote:

> Well, it figures...  Atmel can't say anything in true in their docs untill
> people get mad with complaints.  mel, maybe they are right.  Have you tried
> 10,000 times?  :)

I got about 75,000 consecutive, sequential read/writes out of an AT45
chip
without a single error, and could probably get twice as many if I took
the time to test it some more. Still, there is no way it will make 1M.

Bryan

-- 
Bryan Rittmeyer
mailto:bryanr@flash.net
http://www.flash.net/~bryanr/

• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• Next: Re: TI-H: why is the AVR better
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread