Re: TI-H: e(g)

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: e(g)

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: e(g)
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:55:40 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19981216184457.007e92e0@mail.cybrzn.com>
References: <v04020a01b29e12192543@[24.237.1.152]> <fc.000f62d1001474cb000f62d1001474cb.1474cd@pinecrest.edu>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>so it doesnt support i2c yet...
>hmm
>does putting the e(g) code in the e2 avr produce any desirable effects? or
>is it just a free e2?

so far, just free...

References:

Re: TI-H: e(g)

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

TI-H: e(g)

From: fuzz@pinecrest.edu (David Norelid)

Re: TI-H: e(g)

From: Kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>