Re: TI-H: Batteries

Re: TI-H: Batteries

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Batteries
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 14:59:19 -0900
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19981213174525.007af950@gussie.alaska.net>
• References: <v04020a06b299d406bfcd@[24.237.1.212]> <367412DD.A9DC7BCE@earthling.net> <3.0.6.32.19981213003226.007ad410@gussie.alaska.net> <v04020a01b299d0ef0610@[24.237.1.212]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

I love my Sinclair!  :)

>ooh... Grant defending Z80...
>
>At 11:30 AM 12/13/98 -0900, you wrote:
>>
>>They do when the Z80 is 3MIPS and the IIe is .27 and they have pretty much
>>the same instruction timings...
>>
>>>You and I both know that Mhz doesn't make the man.

• Re: TI-H: Batteries
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Batteries
• From: Gabe <gabeman@earthling.net>
• Re: TI-H: Batteries
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Re: TI-H: Batteries
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Batteries
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: Let's settle this thing once and for all
• Next: Re: TI-H: Let's settle this thing once and for all
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread