Re: TI-H: Re: Ir Link compatability
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Re: Ir Link compatability
Transferring the data to and from the computer with this infrared link is simple.
It just needs a few more parts added to my schematic. I will work on this as
well.
Adam Kavan wrote:
> Osma Suominen wrote:
> >
> > Matthew H. Fogle wrote:
> >
> > > Ah; I see; thanks for clearing that up to me. Hmm; maybe he missed a
> > > UART chip then in his idea. I agree with you then; how can it work as he
> > > said it does? With a special driver it could; and less hardware as well.
> > > Hmm; maybe the TI-92's transfer slightly differently? Maybe he only
> > > tested it with a send or recieve and not normal TI protocol?
> >
> > Nope, the TI-92 uses the exact same protocol as the 8x series. At least on
> > the hardware level it's the same, the packets are slightly different. So
> > our only options are that Greg didn't test it with the TI protocol or that
> > he's lying to us. Or then again, I might be wrong, but as you seem to share
> > my views, I'm getting more and more confident.
> >
> > I'd like to hear from the version with the correct schematic and correct
> > RS232 pinouts, but I still don't think it will work.
> >
> > -Ozone
> >
> > --
> > *** Osma Suominen *** ozone@clinet.fi *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone ***
>
> Would the link work if the data was already converted to RS-232? If so
> we could use a graphlink with it instead. It would cost more but if you
> really wanted ir communication. And if it did need a Graphlink or it
> does somehow convert the TTL to RS-232 then we could create a ir port
> for the computer. We could transfer files to the calcs from a
> distance. Why we would want to do this I'll leave up to someone else
> :).
>
> Adam Kavan
> akavan@cse.unl.edu
> Rember to help support the ban on Dihydrogen Monoxide at
> http://www.netreach.net/~rjones/no_dhmo.html .
>
> Please note this is not my webpag but it is something I feel strongly
> about!
References: