RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way



AM would be another good consideration because the low frequency 
makes part counts and parts very easy to work with.


On Monday, October 06, 1997 6:43 AM, Mike Roberts 
[SMTP:miker@WPI.EDU] wrote:
> Just to throw a somewhate crazy idea into the ring that I 
don't
> know if
> anyone has thought of yet...
> With the wireless link, we've always been assuming we are 
going
> to use FM.
> Why not use sideband instead? Sure, the signal is not as 
clear,
> so we would
> have a lower baud rate, but it might also solve or tx/rx
> problem. Couldn't
> we have on calc (say the originator of the link) be on upper
> sideband and
> the other be on lower sideband for transmit. Hey, it's just a
> thought.
> ---<>
> Mike Roberts
> miker@wpi.edu
> http://www.wpi.edu/~miker
> istanbul.res.wpi.net
> Windows 95 OSR2 --- Linux 2.0.25
> ---<>
> "Did you put the cat out?"  "I didn't know it was burning"
>


Follow-Ups: