Re: TI-H: Okay I maybe overreacted


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Okay I maybe overreacted



Matthew H. Fogle wrote:

> You see the problem though is to make a RF-link capable of working as
> the normal link we must have two channels of radio that can both we
> turned to TX and RX on the fly. This itself would need a driver I think
> since we only have two data lines and the only way to change the RX TX
> would be to control it via a line (I think). I suppose we could make a
> tranciever that would auto switch like VOX or something. Maybe I should
> look into that but I think that will cost far more to make and it might
> already be on the expensive side for a pair. I'm working with one line
> transmit and one line recieve now as this way we only need one
> transmitter and one reciever each tuned to a different freq per calc. I
> agree it would be good to be compatible with the normal link but that's
> just very complex as far as I see it. The main problem with any RF-link

I didn't say it's easy, but it's the only reasonable way.

-Ozone

--
*** Osma Suominen *** ozone@clinet.fi *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone ***


References: