Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF



ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org wrote:
> 
> Robin, Jim, & Eric Barker wrote:
> 
> >   1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the
> > RF link.
> 
> But it's legal (which IS important in some countries!) and probably
> easier to build. It would probably be best to try to design both.
> 
> -Ozone
> 
> --
> *** Osma Suominen *** <a href="mailto:ozone@clinet.fi">ozone@clinet.fi</a> *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone
> ***
> 
>
> Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@defiant.rbk.sollentuna.se




Yeah. kinda like the fbi comes knocking on your door if a teacher
displays a video in class, or you get barracaded in your house and shot
up brutally if you try to leave if you remove your tags on your mattress
or chair. heh


--Steve


References: