Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF



Osma Suominen wrote:
> 
> Robin, Jim, & Eric Barker wrote:
> >   1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the
> > RF link.
> 
> But it's legal (which IS important in some countries!) and probably
> easier to build. It would probably be best to try to design both.


Come on, we can make a legal RF link.  It just can't go that far, maybe 
50 meters.  That's all we need.  How do you think remote control car 
companies do it?


Eric Barker


References: