Re: TIB:86ASM Module Builder

To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TIB:86ASM Module Builder
From: "Dave" <scheltem@aaps.k12.mi.us>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 21:15:32 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


One of the many troubles with the on calc complier is the fact that if the
code is executed and flaws are in it the calc will crash.  That alone almost
defeats the purpose of making a compiler!  Unless of course you want to make
a debugger and then i would say have fun :)  Although this would be great to
have on any calc it would be hard to over come the problems.  Good Luck
Dave
_____________________________________________
ACZ
assembly coders zenith member
e-mail: scheltem@aaps.k12.mi.us
ICQ #16817590
-----Original Message-----
From: BSharp81@aol.com <BSharp81@aol.com>
To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: TIB:86ASM Module Builder


>
>> I think it's wild stuff.
>>
>>  But I still like my idea of creating a compiler (it doesn't bother with
>huge
>>  lookup tables in which you seem to be using).
>>
>>  -Rob
>
>I like the idea of a compiler.  This would work especially well for calcs
>without built in ASM support (82, 85, 92).
>
>Greg Sharp
>