TIB: Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate

To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: TIB: Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate
From: Arno.Kizina@t-online.de (Arno Kizina)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 01:28:16 +0200
Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <CALC-TI%1998081601332128@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


Ray Kremer schrieb:
> ... and here we see the Calc-TI list continuing to beat the dead horse.
>
> Okay, so the HP48 is more powerful or flexible or whatever.  The TI's aren't
> chopped liver.  If people can get everything they need out of a TI-92 and
> not need to read the directions to do it, great!  There aren't really that
> people out there that have the patience or knowledge to read the entire
> manual
one manual?? I read about four:
 2: user 1: system RPN 1: assembly
I didn't like that, so I got me a TI92.		A.K.

 to some computer program or calculator.  Even the HP48 defenders
> admit that it takes some getting used to.  This is America, where we don't
> fix broken things, we throw them out and buy a new one.  You think most
> people want to take that time to get used to a calcualtor?
> Look, you can have your HP48's.  That's fine, I don't have a problem with it.
> Just don't get all bothered because you are in that minority of really smart
> people who have the ability to learn to use the thing.

References:

From:

Prev: TIB: neato cool input trick
Next: TIB: *Big* Mod operations, TI-92
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread