Re: 83 vs. 85/86

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: 83 vs. 85/86
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@ALASKA.NET>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 16:28:19 -0700
Reply-To: Grant Stockly <gussie@ALASKA.NET>

>At 04:00 PM 1/10/98 -0800, CaptainSp wrote:
>>There are less in the 85 to begin with... that's why TI isn't in a hurry
>>to document them.
>>
>>CaptainSp
>>
>
>Umm.... the 85 won't be documented for assembly... the 85 isn't supposed to
>have it... so TI is not going to be supporting it...

Exactly.  If you can access a function in TI-basic, then it can be accessed
in ASm.  No one would have time to figure out all of them, thats why the 83
has 70k if inc files because TI knows where all of them are.  TI knows
about the 85, but since they didn't devolpe it with asm, they won't be
supporting it.

Prev: Re: 83 vs. 85/86
Next: Re: 83 vs. 85/86
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread