Re: 83 vs. 85/86


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 83 vs. 85/86



Gee thanks... it's nice to know SOMEONE out there pays attention to the
fact that TI didn't intend to to give the TI-85 support for ASM.

CaptainSp

Joseph Gaffney wrote:
>
> At 04:00 PM 1/10/98 -0800, CaptainSp wrote:
> >There are less in the 85 to begin with... that's why TI isn't in a hurry
> >to document them.
> >
> >CaptainSp
> >
>
> Umm.... the 85 won't be documented for assembly... the 85 isn't supposed to
> have it... so TI is not going to be supporting it...
>
>  ----------------------------------------------
> |               Joseph M. Gaffney              |
> |    Efnet: rm-rf - gaffney@thethinker.com     |
> |  http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/  |
>  ----------------------------------------------


Follow-Ups: References: