Re: TI-82 programmer at your service.

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-82 programmer at your service.
From: Reinier Zwitserloot <R.Zwitserloot@BTINTERNET.COM>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 17:55:30 GMT
Organization: BT Internet
References: <3.0.3.32.19970824130234.007c5180@megspo.megsinet.net> <3409673f.15992109@news.btinternet.com> <19970831.130626.6214.15.aurora-guy@juno.com>
Reply-To: Reinier Zwitserloot <R.Zwitserloot@BTINTERNET.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:16147

On Sun, 31 Aug 1997 13:05:06 -0400, aurora guy <aurora-guy@JUNO.COM>
wrote:

>If TI used ASM, then why don't they support it?

>Gee, stupid me, thinking basic was written in machine code.

both those come from you. kinda contradicting yourself.

NB: If you term machine code as different from ASM, your arguments of
unstability and support are senseless- machine code is just as
'unstable' as ASM, and ti doesn't support machine code either.

References:

From:

From:

Re: TI-82 programmer at your service.

From: aurora guy <aurora-guy@JUNO.COM>

Prev: Fwd: TI-82 programmer at your service.
Next: Archivists wanted for big TI site
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread