Re: speed

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: speed
From: Doug Torrance <torrance@geocities.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 14:44:42 -0400
Organization: Manticore Software
References: <UPMAIL13.199706181532000463@msn.com> <19970618.084554.7935.0.nxt@juno.com>
Reply-To: torrance@geocities.com
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:14423

n X t wrote:
>
> oh one more thing.. i took my friend's 83.. and (long time ago) and i
> graph something on both. and the ti83 won. i dont' know if it was
> bevcause my mem (ti85) was full (which it is usually full during school
> year) or what..
>
> ---
> -nXt
>    nxt@geocities.com   http://nxt.home.ml.org            <-- Web Page

The 83 won because it has fewer pixels across the screen to try and
figure out where to plot the point.  It has 96, while the 85 has 128.

--
Doug Torrance
torrance@geocities.com
http://profzoom.home.ml.org
(:  Have a happy day!  :)

References:

Re: speed

From: Jeff Tyrrill <Jeff_Tyrrill@MSN.COM>

Re: speed

From: n X t <nxt@JUNO.COM>

Prev: Re: ASM for the 82
Next: Re: 85-splice
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread