Re: TI-85

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-85
From: Jeff Tyrrill <Jeff_Tyrrill@CLASSIC.MSN.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 22:08:24 UT
Reply-To: Jeff Tyrrill <Jeff_Tyrrill@CLASSIC.MSN.COM>

The 83 was developed after the 92.
________________

Jeff Tyrrill
http://tyrrill-ticalc.home.ml.org/
http://ti-files.home.ml.org/


-----Original Message-----
From:   Open discussion of TI Graphing Calculators  On Behalf Of PHC
Sent:   Thursday, August 21, 1997 6:35 AM
To:     CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject:        Re: TI-85

MattC0022 wrote:
>
> i dont know if this makes any sense but wouldnt the newest ones have a
> higher number, and arent the higher the number the better, like
> 80(oldest), 81,82,83(if they make it) 84, (if they make it) , 85,86,etc
> and finally 92(newest)  maybe i am wrong but who really cares

Actually, it is based on the power of the calc.  I think the calc's were
produced in the following order: 80, 81, 85, 82, 83, 92, 86.
--
PHC
paulhc@networkusa.net
http://members.aol.com/agentphc/

Prev: Re: Coversion Error for the TI-85/86?
Next: Re: TI-85
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread