Re: <none>
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: <none>
Yeah, but my school and a few others i know of require TI83s, and
therefore if you dont know what you're doing with your 85, you have to
RTFM.... not that i havent been reading it a lot with my 83 :)
On Fri, 4 Oct 1996, Zenon Lynx wrote:
> Believe me, the TI-85 is not "just a calc" nor is it just a calc for
> "programmers"! It's the most powerful calc around besides the TI-92, and
> the HP's are just plain wierd to work with. I would consider refunding for
> a TI-85 (which, in Canada anyways, it's cheaper than the TI-83, I dunno Y).
> Though the TI-83 has potential, the TI-85 has already established its
> ground in assembly programming and basic subroutines. Its graphical
> analysis are also more accurate in perception (a larger display than the
> TI-83 results in higher resolution) and has functions such as the
> polynomial solver and the equation solver. This is definitely the calc to
> get, and I'm happy with mine (though I did wish I ALSO had a TI-92!)!
> Think it over!
>
> "Canada has no national identity other than our strongest policy:
> multiculturalism"
> -=Zenon=-
>
> ----------
> : From: ashiva@PHENRY.SSD.K12.WA.US
> : To: Zenon
> : Subject: <none>
> : Date: October 4, 1996 6:04 PM
> :
> :
> : I'm A High School Student New To TI Calcs. I recently bought a TI-83, and
> : now that I see what you can do w\ a 85, I wonder If I made the right
> : choice?
> : Should I return it and get a 85, or is the 85 just good for programmers?
> : @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> : @ @@@ @@ @@@@@@@ @@@ @@@ @@@@@@@ @
> : @ @@@@ @@ @@ @@ @@@ @@@ @@ @@ @
> : @ @@ @@@@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@@@@@@ @
> : @ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@@ @@ @@ @
> : @ @@ @ @@@@@@@ @ @@ @@@@@
> : @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> : *Arash Shiva @
> : *E-mail: ashiva@phenry.ssd.k12.wa.us @
> : *WWW: http://198.104.247.11/MacHTTP_2.0/nn.htm @
> : @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> :
>
>
References: