Re: Release of Fargo


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Release of Fargo



Why don't you guys stop crying about this already.  David is in no way
obglitated to do this project.  I believe he is at UCLA, and having gone
there myself, I am sure he is more that a little busy.  If you guys need
fargo so badly, write it yourself.


In my opinion, David should license and sell the fruits of his labor.  Most
of you have no appreciation for the work that has probably gone into
developing the program; and have even less appreciation when getting it for
free.


A while back I wrote a formatted listing and concordance program that works
for 82's, 83's, and 85's.  I had considered posting it until I heard all of
the whining.  I don't need that kind of grief, hence, I have not posted it.




At 02:59 11/9/96 GMT, you wrote:
><<Why is FARGO a single point (of failure) project??  If beta copies are
>floating around, then why doesn't anybody "float" them to the other
>people in this group who do ASM?  This Dave guy may be a talented
>programmer, but he doesn't seem terribly interested in fifnishing it. >>
>
>  Not lately he sure doesn't. Last time he appeared was well over 3 weeks
>ago, and I don't think he's touched fargo in five weeks. Humpf.
>
><<Give all the other folks here who want to bang it out a chance!!  A lot
>of folks here just want to know the back door to get started.  If Dave
>doesn't care about getting it done, then he shouldn't care about other
>folks working on it. Make the information available to all, so somebody
>can get the damn thing done.>>
>
>  I would love to, and so would many others. David is a nice guy, so no
>one wants to go against his requests not to distriibute it, but there's
>been some threats lately going around that some people might release it if
>David doesn't show up any time soon.
>
><<Dave has had, by your own estimate, 5 MONTHS to do a day's work.  He
>has dropped the ball.  Either get it to someone else, or forget FARGO.>>
>
>  Well that "days work" from five months ago has come a long way, and has
>many thaings that are much more than a days work now, but at given time he
>has been a day away from finishing it if he stopped adding things. Of
>course, the big question is when (or if) he will ever get to that last
>day's work.
>
>           -Josh
>


References: